Spontaneous Church Combustion



Silver Members - Listen to Audio Version


From Only £10/month

Subscribe to Lotus Eaters now for full access to premium content.

Subscribe Now

Spontaneous church combustion is a real worry these days. It is a growing concern. You never know when you might be near or in a church when it spontaneously sets itself alight. Churches largely made of stone, which have stood peacefully for centuries, bursting into flames completely of their own accord, and certainly not being the victims of arson, are just one of the realities of the Western world, now. It’s just what happens. There is no possible way to prevent it, or mitigate against it, and, to be honest, you’re a bit of a weirdo if you even notice or comment on it at all. Noticing is not really allowed.

Buildings spontaneously burning down are a perfectly normal event—as natural as a flower turning towards the sun or the cycle of the seasons. Oil refineries, food processing plants, police evidence warehouses, gas pipelines, and cathedrals are all examples of buildings and facilities that will typically burn down or blow up spontaneously. That’s life; that’s how the world is, so get used to it. If noticing this bothers you, it’s best you simply stop noticing. Noticing is what bigots and white supremacists do—you’re not one of them, are you?

Take, for instance, the spontaneous combustion of St Mark’s church in St John’s Wood, London, last weekend. A Grade II listed building, a beautiful piece of cultural heritage, an architectural and historical treasure—well, it went ahead and just burned itself down. That’s just how it goes. That’s part and parcel of the West, now. No proper investigation is needed. It’s obviously a case of spontaneous church combustion. If you think there is even the possibility of an alternative reason, that’s probably your white privilege on display. You’re being systemically racist. Stop asking questions, McCarthy. Stop noticing.

The tendency for Christian places of worship to spontaneously burn down, and occasionally even blow up, is a well-established phenomenon, particularly in France. It is a simple fact of physics that nothing can be done to prevent the trend of churches, abbeys, and cathedrals combusting for no reason, or for their priests to be inexplicably murdered by no one in particular. Nothing can prevent it. Nothing can be done. Trying to protect these places of national heritage is as futile as seeking the elixir of everlasting life. Only a madman would try such a thing. You’re not mad, are you?    

How about when Notre Dame just spontaneously combusted? Remember that? Initially, faulty electrics and then the incompetence/indifference of the French workmen renovating it at the time were blamed. However, when all these possibilities were ruled out, it somehow wasn’t worth talking about anymore. That the mainstream corporate media simply decline to mention the cause of that fire anymore, that the investigation isn’t important, and that there lingers a deafening silence about what really happened, is a significant and righteous win for globalism. Lies of omission piled upon lies of omission. Good. Again, just stop asking. It is really very rude of you to remember, to notice, and to keep on asking. You should probably be put on some kind of watch list for such behaviour.

Googling possible causes or culprits for that particular heinous crime is definitely the territory of a full-blown, radicalised, Trump-loving fascist who is one step away from being a plantation owner or a death camp guard. Finding various articles that claim the priest murderer and grand arsonist of Nantes, Rwandan refugee Emmanuel Abayisenga, also claimed responsibility for the Notre Dame fire, let alone reading them, is the same as being a card-carrying National Socialist. Asking if Abayisenga’s claims have been verified or if there are any other suspects in the Notre Dame incident, is to be the same as Goebbels or Mengele. You’d be putting yourself on the wrong side of history. You don’t want to be on the wrong side of history, do you?  

In the West, at least, we can expect nothing less than all our combustible sites of national heritage to eventually spontaneously combust. Despite it being an utterly natural and unavoidable consequence of normal, explainable physics, we also deserve it, right? Because our ancestors built and controlled an empire, and because we are white, all of our history and heritage justly deserve to be destroyed. Right, comrades? Anything less would be racist. Not submitting, with barely a word of dissent, to your replacement in your own ancestral homeland, and not shrugging your shoulders and keeping quiet when your national treasures are annihilated, is so fragile. If you notice your own destruction, you are a monster. Prevent need to know who you are. Hope Not Hate and Private Eye need to write a hit piece about you. You certainly shouldn’t be allowed a bank account. Noticing is just not allowed; get that through your Nazi head. 

If we know anything for sure, it’s that Islam and Islamism have absolutely nothing to do with any of this. The mass immigration of people who are religiously and ideologically bound and committed to destroying rival religions and ways of life definitely have nothing to do with it. Street beheadings, honour killings, acid attacks, female genital mutilation, war memorial desecration, clergy murders, and church arson all have absolutely no connection with Islam. Anyone who suggests such a despicable thing not only needs locking up, but should be muzzled. Beasts who think they notice any kind of pattern in these phenomena, for their own sake as well as society at large, should be physically gagged, put in a straightjacket, and thrown in a padded cell—the best place for them. Noticing really is a sickening crime that deserves only the most draconian countermeasures. An anti-noticing league should be established. We should create a whole new Department of State for Anti-Noticing. At the very least, a new raft of strict anti-noticing legislation. Anything less is unacceptable.

Share:

Comments